Editorial Policy
This editorial policy explains how Name Love Test creates, reviews, updates, and corrects the content published on www.namelovetest.bond. It applies to all pages on this website: tool pages, editorial content, informational articles, and policy pages.
We maintain editorial standards because our tools produce scores and verdicts that users share with real people. Even though every tool is labeled as entertainment, the explanations behind each score should be factually grounded, clearly written, and transparent about methodology and limitations.
This policy describes our actual editorial workflow, not an aspirational version of it. Where processes are informal or single-person, we say so directly.
Our Editorial Principles
Six principles guide every piece of content on this site, from tool page copy to FAQ answers to this policy itself.
Accuracy
Content is based on verifiable information and checked against reliable sources. Factual claims are cross-referenced before publication and during subsequent reviews.
Transparency
Every scoring formula, weight, calibration curve, and compatibility matrix is documented on its respective tool page. We clearly distinguish factual information from editorial explanation and entertainment.
Relevance
Content directly serves the reader's search intent. We explain how tools work, what scores mean, and what their limitations are, without unnecessary filler or keyword-stuffed padding.
Originality
Our scoring engines, factor breakdowns, calibration curves, and editorial explanations are original work. We do not reproduce content from other websites or repackage material without attribution.
Clarity
Content is structured for readability. Technical concepts (such as numerology digit roots, multiset overlaps, and vowel ratios) are explained in plain language before any formula is shown.
Accountability
Readers can report errors, outdated information, or broken links through our contact page. We investigate every editorial report and correct confirmed errors promptly.
How Our Content Is Created
Every page on Name Love Test follows the same editorial workflow, adapted to the page type. Here is the process from topic selection to ongoing maintenance.
Topic Selection & Intent Research
Before creating a new tool or content page, we research what users actually search for and what questions they need answered. We identify the primary search intent (informational, navigational, or tool based) and design the page structure around it.
Research & Source Collection
For factual claims, such as the origins of FLAMES, the Pythagorean numerology system, or the Barnum effect, we locate primary or authoritative sources. For mathematical methodology, we document the formula derivation and test it against known inputs before writing the explanation.
Content Drafting
Content is drafted with a clear heading hierarchy (one H1, logical H2 sections, H3 sub-sections). Technical concepts are explained in plain language first, then supported with formulas, diagrams, or examples where appropriate.
Fact-Checking & Review
Factual claims are cross-referenced against their original sources. Scoring formulas are tested with known inputs to verify expected outputs. Calibration curves are checked for edge cases. This review is currently performed by the site's creator, Robert Brown.
Formatting & Accessibility
Content is reviewed for readability, semantic HTML structure, keyboard navigability, screen-reader compatibility, and WCAG-compliant contrast ratios. Images receive descriptive alt text. Interactive elements receive ARIA labels.
Publication & Ongoing Monitoring
After publication, content is periodically reviewed for accuracy, outdated information, broken links, and opportunities to improve explanations based on user feedback.
Research and Sources
The type of source we consult depends on the subject matter. Our content draws from several categories of information:
- Academic research: Psychological studies (e.g., Forer's 1948 Barnum effect study, Sternberg's triangular theory of love) are cited by researcher name and year when referenced.
- Mathematical documentation: Numerology systems (Pythagorean, Chaldean) are referenced from established numerological literature. Scoring formulas are original but documented transparently.
- Cultural and historical sources: The FLAMES method, for example, is documented with its origins as a playground game rather than credited to any single inventor, because no authoritative origin source exists.
- Original analysis: Our scoring engines, calibration curves, factor weights, and compatibility matrices are original creations. They are documented in full on each tool page so users can verify the math.
We do not claim partnerships with academic institutions, research organizations, or professional bodies. When we reference published research, we cite the researchers, not ourselves, as the source.
How We Cite and Attribute Sources
Our attribution practices differ by content type:
- Named references: When citing a specific study, researcher, or theory, we name the researcher and study directly in the text (e.g., "psychologist Bertram Forer demonstrated this in 1948").
- Original methodology: Scoring formulas and compatibility matrices are original to this site. They are documented in full on each tool page, not attributed to external sources, because they are our own work.
- Cultural references: Methods like FLAMES are described with their commonly understood cultural context rather than attributed to a specific inventor.
- Distinguishing original from external: Original editorial analysis is presented as our own. External claims are attributed to their source. The distinction is made through language ("according to…", "research by…") rather than footnotes.
Fact-Checking Standards
We make reasonable efforts to verify factual information before publication and during subsequent reviews. Our fact-checking process includes:
- Cross-referencing factual claims against primary or authoritative sources
- Testing scoring formulas with known inputs to verify expected outputs
- Verifying that named researchers, dates, and study details are accurate
- Checking internal and external links for correctness
- Reviewing score calibration curves for edge-case behavior
- Flagging and reviewing content that may have become outdated
We do not promise perfect accuracy. Errors can occur, and when they do, we correct them through the process described in our Corrections Policy below.
Editorial Review Process
Name Love Test is currently a single-person operation. All content (writing, scoring methodology, fact-checking, and editorial decisions) is handled by Robert Brown, the site's creator and lead writer.
There is no multi person editorial board, no separate fact-checking department, and no external review committee. We state this directly because we believe transparency about our actual process is more trustworthy than implying a larger team exists.
The practical review workflow is:
As the site grows, we may introduce additional reviewers or subject matter consultants. If and when that happens, this policy will be updated to reflect the change.
Authors and Contributors
All content on Name Love Test is currently written and maintained by one person:
We do not fabricate author profiles, create fictional experts, or assign credentials that do not exist. If additional contributors join the site in the future, their real names and relevant backgrounds will be displayed.
Content Updates and Maintenance
Published content is not static. We review and update pages to maintain accuracy and usefulness. Updates may include:
- Correcting factual errors or outdated information.
- Updating scoring formulas or calibration curves when methodology improves.
- Replacing broken internal or external links.
- Improving explanations based on user feedback or common questions.
- Adding new FAQ entries or expanding existing sections.
- Removing obsolete content that no longer serves the reader.
- Updating tool behavior when edge cases are discovered.
The "Last Updated" date displayed on each page represents the date of the most recent meaningful editorial change. We do not change publication dates simply to make old content appear new. Minor formatting adjustments, typo fixes, or metadata changes without substantive content updates do not warrant a date change.
Corrections Policy
When an error is discovered, whether by our team or reported by a reader, we follow this process:
Error reported or discovered. We receive the report through our contact page or identify the issue during a periodic review.
Investigation. We verify the reported claim against available sources and evidence.
Correction applied. If the error is confirmed, the content is corrected and the page's "Last Updated" date is revised.
Significant corrections acknowledged. For substantial factual corrections, not typos or minor wording changes, we may add a brief note explaining what was corrected.
Found an error? Please contact our editorial team with the page URL, the specific claim or section in question, and supporting evidence when available. We investigate every report.
Tool and Calculator Methodology
Name Love Test publishes six interactive compatibility tools. Each tool uses a distinct methodology, and each methodology is documented in full on the respective tool page.
Across all tools, these standards apply:
- Formulas are documented. Every factor, weight, matrix value, and calibration curve is explained on the tool page. Users can verify the math independently.
- Inputs never leave the browser. All calculations run client-side in JavaScript. No names, dates, or personal data are transmitted to any server.
- Results are deterministic. The same inputs always produce the same output. There is no randomization in any scoring engine.
- Entertainment, not advice. Every tool page carries an entertainment badge and a clear disclaimer. These tools do not predict, assess, or measure real relationship compatibility.
- Edge cases are tested. Scoring engines are tested with automated test suites to verify correct behavior for empty inputs, single character names, extremely long names, non Latin scripts, and identical names.
- Errors can be reported. Users can report unexpected scoring behavior through the contact page.
For the specific methodology behind each tool, visit the tool's page: Name Love Test, DOB Calculator, Marriage Type, FLAMES, First Letter, or Numerology.
Editorial Independence
Name Love Test does not currently carry display advertising, sponsored articles, paid reviews, or affiliate links. Editorial decisions, including which tools to build, how to score them, and what to explain, are made independently by the editorial team.
If commercial relationships are introduced in the future (such as advertising or affiliate partnerships), this policy will be updated to explain how they are separated from editorial content. Sponsored content, if ever published, will be clearly labeled as such.
Limitations of Our Content
We believe transparency about limitations is more valuable than overpromising accuracy. Here is what our content can and cannot do:
- Information can change. Facts, research findings, and best practices evolve. We review content periodically, but some information may become outdated between reviews.
- Errors may occur. Despite our review process, mistakes can slip through. We correct confirmed errors promptly when they are reported or discovered.
- Our tools are entertainment. Compatibility scores based on names, birth dates, or letter patterns do not predict relationship outcomes. They measure real linguistic and numerical properties, but those properties have no proven link to romantic compatibility.
- We are not licensed professionals. Our content is not a substitute for advice from qualified therapists, counselors, psychologists, or other professionals. For relationship concerns, please consult a qualified professional.
- Coverage is not exhaustive. Our explanations of concepts like numerology, astrology, and personality psychology are introductory. They do not cover every tradition, school of thought, or interpretation.
How to Report an Error or Provide Feedback
If you find a factual error, a broken link, an unexpected scoring result, or outdated information on any page, we want to know.
When reporting an issue, please include:
- The URL of the affected page
- The specific claim, section, or tool behavior you believe is incorrect
- Supporting evidence or a source, when available
- For tool bugs: the exact inputs you used and the result you received
We read every report personally and respond within a few days. If the error is confirmed, we correct it and update the page accordingly.
Contact Our Editorial Team
Website
Editorial Contact
Contact Form
Lead Writer
Policy Updates
This editorial policy is reviewed periodically and updated when our processes change.
| Version | Date | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | September 2025 | Initial publication of the editorial policy. |
If material changes are made to this policy, the update will be noted in the table above. Minor wording improvements may be made without a version increment.